1. هداوند، مهدی، ) 1389 (، حقوق اداری تطبیقی، ج دوم، تهران، انتشارات سمت 1
2. زارعی، محمد حسین و مهدی مرادی برلیان،) « ،)1393 مفهوم وجایگاه اصل تناسب در حقوق اداری با نگاهی ویژه به نظام حقوقی اتحادیه اروپایی »، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، شماره 66 ، ) 145 - 183 (
3. زارعی، محمد حسین و خدیجه شجاعیان، «جایگاه اصول غیر عقلانی بودن و تناسب در نظام حقوقی انگلستان »، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، شماره 13 ، 1392 ، )390-347(
4. سیموندز، نیل ای. « 1381 فلسفه حقوق »، ترجمه محمد راسخ، در: حق و مصلحت، تهران، طرح نو.
5. مشهدی، علی و مراد، جلیلی، « 1392 دکترین صلاحیت تخییری در حقوق ایران و فرانسه »، مجموعه مقالات حقوق اداری، ) 291 - 296 (
6. رحمانی، زهره، برابریِ حق، رساله ی دکتری، تهران، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، 1388
7-Dworkin, Ronald, (1978), Taking Right Seriously, Harvard University Press
8-Gnes, Matteo. (2019), Basic principles of administrative procedure according to EU law and their influence on national administrative procedural laws, university of Urbino, Italy, Bruxelles
9-Hofmann, Herving. C. H. (2014), General principle of EU law and administrative
law, in: c. barnard and s. peers (eds.) European union law, oxford university press,
)(forthcoming
10-Simmonds, N.E. (1986), «Central Issues in Jurisprudence», Sweet & Maxwell
11-Wade,William. & Forsyth, Christopher. (2004), administrative law, 9ed, New .York. Oxford university press
12-Batalli, M. & Fejzullahu, A. (2018), Principles of Good Administration under
the European Code of Good Administrative Behavior, Pecs Journal of International
)and European Law, (26-35
13-Bugaric, Bojan. (2004), Openness and transparency in public administration:
challenges for public law”, harvard law school library, wisconsin international law
) journal, vol.22, No.3, (482521-
14-Fisher, Elizabeth, (2010), “Transparency and administrative law: A critical evaluation,
Oxford journals, Vol.63, Issue.1,(272-314)15-Hattab, Muayad. K. (2018),
The doctrine of
15-legitimate expectation & proportionality: A public law principle
adopted into the private law of employment”, Liverpool law review, Vol. 39, N. 3,
)(239-264
16-Kask, Oliver. (2011), On the notion of good governance and good administration,
European commission for democracy through law (Venice commission),
.)(1-24
17-Kristjansdohir, Margret. Vala. (2013), Good administration as a fundamental
.)right, Islandic review of politics and administration, Vol.9, Issue.1, (237-255
18-Lanza, Elisabetta. M. (2008), The right to good administration in the European
union. Roots, rations and enforcement in antitrust case-law, Teoria del Diritto e
)dello stato 1-2-3, Available at SSRN: http//:ssrn.com/abstract/1593523, (479-490
19-Lenaerts, Koen. (2007), The rule of law and the coherence of the judicial system
)of the European union CML rev. 44, (1625-59
20-Marume, S. B. M. , Jubenkanda, R. R. , Namusi, N. C. & Madziyire, N.C.
(2016), The Concept of the Rule of Law IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social
)Science,Vol.21, Issue.3, (82-89
21-Migliari, Wellington. & Ponce, Juli. (2017), Good administration: the principle
of transparency and its use by the international civil society Revista da AGU, Bra-
)silia-DF, Vol.16, N.o3, (59-86
22-Mustafa, Areean. (2017), Comprehension of the principle of good administra-
)tion in the framework of EU administrative law JUHD, Vol.3, NO.1, (259-267
23-Negrut, Vasilica. (2011), Europeanization of public administration through the
)general principles of good administration The Acta u.danublus Jur (5-15
24-Ponce, Juli. (2005), Good administration and administration procedures, Indiana
)Journal of global legal studies, Vol.12, Issue.12, (551-588
25-Ranjan, Vivek, (2010), Rule of law and modern administrative law, RGSOIPL,
.)IIT Kharagpur, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1761506, (1-20
26-Stephens, Charles, (2009), The jurisprudence of lord denning: A study in legal
)history scholars publishing, Vol.2, (81-114
27-Suprenal, Jerzy, (2011), Good Administration in European Administrative Law,
.Institute of Administrative Studies, University of Wroclaw
28-The European Ombudsman, The European Code of Good Administrative
Behavior, (2001), office for official publications of the European Communities,
.)L-2985 Luxembourg, (16 pages
29-Vaughn, Robert G. (2011), Transparency in the administration of law: The
relationship between differing justifications for transparency and differing views of
administrative law, American university international law review, Vol.26, Issue.4,
)(968-982
30-Herselman, Lodewikus, Stephanus. (2014), Lawful, reasonable and fair decision-
making in disciplinary cases in secondary schools, A thesis submitted in
fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of philosophiae doctor(PH.D) in
university of pretoria
31-Cilibiu, Octavia. Maria. (2011), The decisional transparency in public administration,
Lecture juridical sciences and letters faculty, constantin Brancusi universi-
)ty of Tg-Jiu (e-mail: taviamara@yahoo.com
32-Parchomiuk, Jerzy. (2018), Abuse of discretionary powers in administrative law,
evolution on the judicial review models: from administrative morality to the principle
of proportionality, research project, financed from funds of the national science
)center, Poland.(ref. UMD-2015/17/b/hs5/00430),(453-478
)