نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب ، تهران ، ایران
2 دانشیار گروه حقوق،دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب،تهران ،ایران
3 عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه امام صادق (ع)
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The principle of documenting, reasoning and justifying the opinions of quasi-judicial authorities is one of the important elements of a fair and just trial. Given that administrative decisions are linked to the public interest, the application of this principle in decisions and rulings issued by these authorities, as well as the oversight of the Court of Administrative Justice as a judicial institution on the rulings issued by these authorities can be a reason to evaluate the performance of the government and the judiciary. Be equal to the public conscience of society. Examining the judicial procedure of quasi-judicial authorities and the Court of Administrative Justice, it seems that paying attention to the principles of fair trial in general and monitoring the reasoning and documenting of opinions and decisions in particular has not yet found its proper place. Although in some cases these principles and their importance have been mentioned in the judicial procedure of the Court of Administrative Justice, this issue has not been considered by the quasi-judicial authorities. In addition, this issue has not yet reached its true place in the jurisprudence of the Administrative Court of Justice, and this issue has become more and more important due to the pervasiveness of fair trial in legal systems. In this article, we examine the position of the reasoned principle, documenting and justifying the opinions of quasi-judicial authorities in judicial procedure.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)