The use of artificial intelligence in decision-making, despite its advantages - speed, creativity, reduction of discrimination and bias - also raises concerns about its accuracy, fairness and responsibility. Allowing people to contest to automated decisions that affect them is a useful tool to protect their rights, freedoms and legitimate interests. This article explains the position of this right in Iran's legal system by descriptive analytical method and using library resources after explaining the right to contest to automatic decision-making and reflecting this right in the international and national arena. The results of the research show that although many countries have recognized the right to contest to automatic decisions, the approaches in explaining the legal status of this right - from standard-oriented to rule-based and from procedural framing to substantive formulation - is variable. In Iran's legal system, we are faced with the lack of provisions supporting automatic decision-making and, consequently, their contestability; an issue that requires identification with the expansion of the use of artificial intelligence in public and private spheres. Therefore, it is necessary to explicitly identify the right to protest by law and the need for a systematic mechanism in the relevant laws to explain the substantive elements of this right by going through purely procedural processes