The Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law

The Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law

The Entirety of Contract Clause in Construction Projects and government Contracts with an Emphasis on General Terms of Contract.

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D student of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant professor of Department Private Law, Faculty of Humanities, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, , Iran.
3 Assistant professor of Department Private Law, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/mral.2024.2009796.1506
Abstract
According to an entirety of contract clause, the contract includes all the agreements between the parties and they cannot invoke implied terms and former agreements which are in contradiction with the contractual terms, with the exception of the points on which the parties are silent. Therefore, the function and use of the entire contract clause, as a ‘covering clause’, is to remove the contradictions among the written final terms in a contract text.

To answer the question ‘what are the relationships between the entire contract clause and the contract general terms including agreement, general terms and private terms?’, the present research studied the relationships between the entire contract clause and instructions in the execution standards regulation for civil projects approved by the board of ministers in July 21, 1972, which controls the identical contracts including agreement, general terms and private terms and, their classification into three categories of irrevocable (category 1), common (category 2) and guidance (category 3). While, using the abovementioned clause in any contract coming under the instructions of any of these categories has its own particular instruments and requirements, stating it in the contacts of category 1 is exclusively in the discretion of Program and Budget Organization; but, in category 2, the parties have discretions just limited to the related instructions; and, in category 3, the parties may include the clause in their contract without any restrictions.
Keywords
Subjects

  1. In Persian

    1. Books
    2. Esfahani , M . 2017 . Margin to makaseb . 5th vol ., Nashr-e Bina ;
    3. Ansari, Sh. M. 1989. Al-Makaseb. 2nd, Al-Naaman Institute. Beirut;
    4. Ansari, V. 2001. Administrative Contracts Law Generalities. Nashr-e Danesh;
    5. Jafari Langaroodi, M. J. 1999. The Effect of Willpower on Civil Law. Ganj-e Danesh Pub. Tehran;
    6. Jafari Langaroodi, M. J. 1990. The Law of Obligations . Ganj-e Danesh Pub. Tehran;
    7. Habibi , M . 2013 . Interpretation of International Commercial Contracts. 2nd Nashr-e Mizan;
    8. Shahidi, M. 2003. The Effects of Contracts and Obligations . Majd Pub. Tehran;
    9. Shahidi, M. 2023. Terms of Contract. Majd Pub. Tehran;
    10. Tabatabaei Yazdi, S. M. K. 1958. Makaseb Interpretation. 2nd, Esmaeilian Press Institute. Qom;
    11. Katoozian, N. 2014. The General Rules of Contracts. 3rd, Enteshar Corporation. Tehran;
    12. Mohaghegh Damad, S. M.; Ghanavati, j.; Vahadati Shobeiri, S. H.; & Abdipoor, E. 2012. Contracts Law in Imamieh Jurisprudence. 1st Samt Pub. Tehran;
    13. Mohaghegh Damad, S. M. 2020. Pubic Theory of Terms and Obligations in Islamic Law. 1st Oloum Eslami Pub;

     

    B )Articles

    1. Ebrahimi A.; & Ebrahimi, M. 2018. The Study and Suggestions on some of the Content of Articles of General Conditions in Contracts (4311 Journal). The Elites of Sciences and Engineering , Issue 2, Series 2;
    2. Aalaei Fard, M. A. 2005. The Principles of Governmental Contracts. Edalat-e Ara Legal Magazine. Issue 1;
    3. Emami, M.; & Ostovar Sangari, Koorosh. The Principles Governing to Regularity and make Governmental Contracts. Bar association Magazine, New Series, Issue 11;
    4. Izanloo, M.;Cheraghi ,M . Merger Clause and it,s Validiti in Iran Law and Islamic Jurisprudence . 2020 . Nashr-e Hoghoghe Melal ;

     

    C)Thesis

    1. Amiran Bakhshayeshi, Ei. 2003. The Theory of implied condition in Iranian and English laws. Qom Education Complex. Qom. Tehran University;
    2. Hormozi, Kh. 1997. Objective Test and Subjective Test and Their Roles in Contract Interpretation. Thesis for MA degree. Tehran University. Tehran.

     

    منابع انگلیسی مقاله

    1. Arrowsmitrh, Sue, Public Procurement: An Appraisal of UNCITRAL Model Law as A Global Standard, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 53, Jan, 2004. Pp. 17-46.

    2.Black,s law Dictionary . 7th ed .

    3.Eisenberg , Melvin . Afoundational principles of contract law . oxford , university press . 2018

    4.Larry A. DiMatteo , Andre Janssen , Ulrich Magnus , Reiner Schulze . International Sales Law : A Handbook . London : Zed Books ; 2021

    5.Principles of international commercial contract , unidroit press , Rome 1994 .

     

     

     

Volume 6, Issue 20
Sixth year, 20th issue, ّFall 2024
Autumn 2024
Pages 275-300

  • Receive Date 24 August 2023
  • Revise Date 12 April 2024
  • Accept Date 14 April 2024