The Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law

The Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law

Managing the conflict of interests of the stock market in the mirror of legislative norms

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD Student, Public law,, Allameh Tabatabayii University,, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Prof., Department of Administrative Law, Research Institute of Public and International Law,, Judiciary Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The stock market is currently one of the most important areas of communication and interaction between government and citizens. Citizens who invest in this market expect the government to act in a transparent and law-abiding manner to protect the interests of investors. One of the important manifestations of the government's trustworthy behavior is the prevention and fight against corruption in this area to ensure the dynamism and predictability of the stock market for investors and the country's economy. Prevention and management of conflict of interest in the stock market and securities is the main example of prevention and fight against corruption. After analyzing the rules and regulations in the legislative sphere of the country, we can see examples of norms governing conflicts of interest in the stock market, but these rules and regulations must be developed and include all instances of conflicts of interest. Currently, such as declaration of assets, transparency and disclosure, prohibition of simultaneous employment, prohibition of parallel activities with public duties, prohibition of participation of stakeholders in official decisions, maintaining neutrality, protection of confidential information, prohibition of ownership or ownership of shares Decision-makers and battalion leaders are provided for in the rules and regulations; But this chain can be completed and comprehensive conflict of interest management guaranteed in this area.

Highlights

Summary of Article

Conflict of interest in recent years has been one of the prominent issues in public and governmental institutions, which is referred to as the gray area and an opportunity to commit corruption. One of the institutions that has become a source of conflict of interest in recent years is the stock exchange. Securities are a means of aggregating micro-capital to facilitate investment by those in need of cash. Of course, it should be said that the regulation of the capital market has been done and is under supervision, and the transactions in it are approved by the Stock Exchange Organization and other competent authorities.

Due to the need for a clear legal framework on the stock exchange of one of the most important financial institutions, in our country, several laws have been approved on the stock exchange, but now the law "Securities Market of the Islamic Republic of Iran" approved in 1984 governs this area. Is. This law has advantages over previous laws and regulations, such as regulating the primary market, diversifying financial instruments, and overseeing the pillars and institutions operating in the capital market.

The main question of this research is whether the rules and regulations in the field of stock exchange include rules for the prevention and management of conflict of interest, and if so, what examples of conflict of interest management do these norms cover? Our initial hypothesis is that, given the passage of the Securities Market Act in recent years, traces of conflict of interest management can be found in this law and its related regulations; However, the need to integrate these laws and regulations and anticipate new examples of conflict of interest management is one of the shortcomings of the legal system that needs to be addressed.

Conceptual limitation of conflict of interest management

Conflict of interest is a situation in which the actions and decisions of professions based on primary interests are adversely affected by secondary interests. Primary interests refer to public interests such as the protection of public welfare and the professional and institutional duties of the public official, and secondary interests often include personal interests such as financial interests; But it is not limited to financial interests, and the demands of relatives and friends are also subject to secondary interests, which in English and French law are also referred to as abuse of power and are subject to judicial review. Conflict management policies focus more on interests and financial relationships; Because these relationships and interests are more measurable than other interests; Thus, a conflict of interest occurs when a public official in charge of the performance of duties by the people has private interests that these private or other interests conflict with the public interest, and this affects the impartiality and purpose of performing public duties or with the aim of influencing performance. It becomes.

The most important tools to prevent conflicts of interest are: absolute prohibition of gift acceptance, regulation or restriction of political activities, prohibition of employment and hiring of relatives, restriction of membership in boards, non-governmental organizations, corporations and other non-profit organizations, non-profit affiliation or non-profit affiliation. Personal, non-acceptance of a second job potentially in conflict with the public duties of official authorities, commitment or association with associations or racial, ethnic, or religious occupations, disclosure of public information, prohibition of representation and work for foreign countries, declaration of personal income and assets , Declaration of family assets and income, Declaration of personal interests related to contracts, Declaration of personal interests related to decision making, Restrictions and control of transactions and occupations or activities of non-governmental organizations after employment, Restriction and control of simultaneous external appointments such as employment in political, governmental or governmental organizations.

The role of transparency and disclosure in managing the conflict of interests of the stock exchange

Public officials should be aware of the situation of conflict of interest and prevent it from occurring, and if it occurs, report it to the supervisor as soon as possible and make their final decision without conflict of interest; So that these decisions do not cause conflicts of interest. Transparency is a necessary element of conflict of interest management, which in fact provides information to citizens and stakeholders clearly and simply. This component allows rational and impartial decisions to be made. One of the most important issues of disclosure and transparency can be considered the declaration of income and assets of officials. In countries with a view to accumulating corruption, public officials are usually required to declare their wealth and assets.

The role of protection of confidential information in the management of conflicts of interest on the stock exchange

Confidential information received from the public by agents should not be disclosed except to competent authorities and should not be used as a means of personal gain. It is the duty of employees to refrain from disclosing confidential information to family, friends or other former colleagues; Because there is always a fear of misuse of people's personal information for or against other people, and this ban is due to the non-exchange of private and appropriate information of the people, which is exploited and misused for personal interests, both economic and non-economic. Benefits for these employees or other persons to be considered. Disclosure of confidential information is also prohibited in other countries; Because the private sector is always looking to make more profit and reduce costs, and therefore, one of the ways to achieve this goal is to access government decision-makers and buy their information.

The role of neutrality in managing the conflict of interests of the stock exchange

The main basis of neutrality should be considered in the equality of individuals in relation to each other and in relation to public officials before the law. Different countries have enacted various laws and regulations to ensure neutrality and, consequently, to prevent corruption. Political influence in the pillars of the stock exchange organization and irregular transfer of managers of this institution can be a violation of independence and, consequently, the departure of this institution from the path of neutrality.

Result

Due to the dispersion and non-revision of these laws and regulations, it seems that the legislator should formulate and approve a comprehensive law on prevention and management of conflict of interest in the stock market to minimize corruption and conflict of interest in this area and shareholders and companies active in the stock market. To operate in the stock market with a comprehensive view of conflict of interest situations. For this purpose, codes of professional conduct of policy makers, managers, employees and brokers can be developed and approved to anticipate situations of conflict of interest and reciprocal actions. In addition, we should see a glass exchange in which the decision makers of this market make decisions with more transparency in order to provide the ground for people to monitor this area through the media and press and to minimize the abuse of authority in the stock exchange institution. In this case, it is possible to significantly reduce the conflict of interest and its management in the stock exchange.

Keywords
Subjects

 
1-     Bikian, Mohammad Reza (1394). Legal view on commodity exchange transactions, Majd Publications, first edition.
2-     Jahankhani, Ali and Ali Parsaiyan (1374). Stock Exchange, University of Tehran School of Management Publications, First Edition.
3-     Razzaqi, Abolfazl and Seyed Abbas Parhizkari (1396). Conflict of Interest, Prevention and Management Strategies, Center for Economic Research, Office of Public Sector Economic Studies, Serial Number: 15801.
4-     Zarei, Mohammad Hossein and Azita Mohsenzadeh (2013). "Democratic Administrative Law and the Weberian Bureaucracy Paradigm", Thoughts on Administrative Law (collection of articles donated to Professor Dr. Manouchehr Motameni Tabatabai), Tehran, Majd Publications.
5-     Soltani, Mohammad (1396). Capital Market Law, Samat Publications, Third Edition.
6-     Mehranfar, Mohammad Reza (1389). Introduction to the concepts of stock exchange, Challenge Publishing, third edition.
7-     Companion of the sermon, Abolfazl (1383). Corruption: Causes, contexts and strategies to combat it, Tehran: Research Institute for Strategic Studies.
 
8-     Bagheri, Mahmoud and Javad Sidi (1387). Convergence and Competition in Stock Markets: Conflict of Competition Law and Stock Market Law, Law Quarterly, Volume 38, Number 3, pp. 57-83.
9-     Junidi, Laia and Mohammad Norouzi (1388). Understanding the nature of confidential information in the stock market, Law Quarterly, Volume 39, Number 2, pp. 129-147.
10-  Rasekh, Mohammad (1385). Intrinsic and Transversal Characteristics of Law, Quarterly Journal of Parliament and Research, Volume 13, Number 51, pp. 13-40.
11-  Renani, Mohsen and Khezri, Mohammad (1383). Rent and its social costs, Mofid Quarterly, No. 45, pp. 45-80.
12-  Rahbar, Navid (1396). Maintaining the Independence of the Stock Exchange and Securities System of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Comparative Legal Studies, Volume 8, Number 1, pp. 179-202.
13-  Sadeghi Moghadam, Hassan and Mohammad Norouzi (1390). Critique and review of information disclosure system in Iran Stock Exchange, Law Quarterly, Volume 41, Number 2, pp. 131-149.
14-  Naji, Morteza (1385). Impartiality in Criminal Procedure, Legal Journal of Justice, Nos. 56 and 57, pp. 78-29.
15-  Vakilian, Hassan and Davar Derakhshan (1396). Investigating the Effectiveness of Property Disclosure Laws in Reducing Administrative Corruption with a Comparative Approach, Bi-Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Perspectives, No. 77-78, pp. 225-250.
16-  Rules of Procedure of the Parliament of Finland adopted in 2015.
17-  Executive Instruction on Disclosure of Information of Companies Registered with the Stock Exchange Organization, approved in 2007.
18-  Executive Instruction on Foreign Investment Regulations in Stock Exchanges and OTC Markets, approved in 2011.
19-  Instruction for certification of professional qualifications of managers of financial institutions, approved in 2007.
20-  Instructions of the Conciliation Committee of the Association of Stock Brokers and Securities approved in 2008.
21-  The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran approved in 1979 and amended in 1989.
22-  Italian Constitution adopted in 1947 and amended in 2012.
23-  Securities Market Law of the Islamic Republic of Iran, approved in 2005.
24-  Canadian Conflict of Interest Code passed in 2006 and amended in 2015.
 
25-   Afghanistan Public Policy Research Organization (2019). National Strategy for Combating Corruption in Afghanistan: A Critical Assessment.
26-   Barcham, M (2007). Corruption in Pacific Island Countries, UNDP Pacific Centre.
27-   Borlini, L (2019). Codes of conduct for public officials, GRECO findings & recommendations, Strasbourg.
28-   CEPEJ (2014). Report on European judicial systems, efficiency and quality of justice.
29-     Esadze, L (2013). Guidelines for Prevention of Conflict of Interest, Belgrade, Serbia.
30-   Gilman. S. C (2005). Ethics Codes and Codes of Conduct as Tools for Promoting an Ethical and Professional Public Service: Comparative Successes and Lessons, the World Bank, Washington DC.
31-   Hoppe, T (2015). The case of for asset declarations in the judiciary: identifing illicit enrichment and conflicts of interests, Michelsen Institute.
32-   Jenkins, M (2015). Conflicts of Interest Topic Guide, Transparency International, 2015.
33-   Lo, B and Marilyn J Field (2009). Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice, Washington DC, The National Academies Press.
34-   Michael D and Stark Andrew (2001). Conflict of Interest in the Professions, New York: Oxford University Press,
35-   Nayak, V (2009). Transparency in the Disclosure of Assets by Judges - Basic components of a disclosure law and what we can learn from other countries, New Delhi.
36-   Prosecution Service (2018). Standards of Conduct – Conflict of Interest and Protection of Confidential Information, Crown Counsel Policy Matual.
37-   Salminen, A, Olli Pekka Viinamake and Kola Worrbacka, Rinnai (2009). The control of corruption in Finland, administrative management public.
38-   Sanz. B (2017). Codes of Conduct and Conflicts of Interest at any governance level of the management of EU Funds, Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union.
39-   Stan, L, (2004). The Romanian Anticorruption Bill, Centre for Post-Communist Studies.
40-   Stefan, L, Septimius Pârvu., Munir Podumlijak. and Cornelia Cozonac (2012). Conflicts of interest and incompatibilities in Eastern Europe, Rule of Law Program South East Europe.
41-   TAIEX Seminar (2015). Conflict of Interest in the Judiciary", EU Delegation in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH).
42-   Villoria Mendieta, M (2007). Conflict-of-interest policies and practices in nine EU member states: a comparative review, SIGMA.
 
43-   Bryan K. and Kuang Xi (2009). "Conflicts of Interest, Disclosure, and (Costly) Sanctions: Experimental Evidence", The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 38, No. 2.
44-   Demmke, C and Thomas Henokl (2007). "Managing Conflicts of Interests – Ethics Rules and Standards in the Member States and the European Institutions", EIPASCOPE, No 3.
45-   Rexha, A (2014). "Is the asset declarations system in Kosovo helping the fight against corruption and preventing the abuse of power?", A Policy Report by Group for Legal And Political Studies, NO 8.
Volume 2, Issue 5
Second year, fifth issue, winter 2020
Winter 2020
Pages 165-189

  • Receive Date 27 November 2020
  • Revise Date 11 February 2021
  • Accept Date 31 January 2021