Document Type : Original Article
Highlights
Censorship of Films of Masoud Kimiaei and Ali Hatami in the light of the Censorship law of 1980s of Iran
Due to new legal system governing over cinema of Iran after Islamic Revolution, the censorship system in the early 1980's was very different With the new constitution including: right of free artistic expression as one of the types of freedom originated from victory of regime that its main slogan was freedom. Meanwhile, Ali Hatami, Masoud Kimiaei by having excellent record in the field of film making before Islamic Revolution and in spite of attempts for compatibility with new framework of cinema of Islamic Republic of Iran, was not able to free from strict censorship system. Generally, the strict censorship of films more than having legal aspect, had beyond legal aspect influenced by chaos social and political conditions of 1980's; meanwhile, persons in charge of censorship neglected that the purpose of film makers was only producing an artistic work with theme of social affairs.
In the films of Masoud Kimiaei, The Red Line movie due to not observing Islamic hijab, showing different appearance of a security officer, Razor and Silk movie due to showing denigrate image of prisons and focusing on drug addiction, Haji Washington movie due to showing ironical image of ambassador of Iran and dedication of ambassador of Iran against USA, Jafar Khan Returned from Europe movie due to cultural influence of aliens in form of comedy and struggle of modernity, tradition and depending on Europe countries were censored due to beyond text reasons. Moreover, censorship system was incompatible with by-law of year 1965 and 1983 during 1980's. Generally, the movies of Ali Hatami and Masoud Kimiaei were faced with abuse of authorities of Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance due to weird social, political and cultural chaos during 1980's. Due to these ups and downs, theses film directors lost their energy and hope for producing good movies and the passed time is not compensated. The good consequence for these mistakes for applying strict censorship system and prevention of violation of rights of artists, we have offered 2 maximum and minimum recommendations including:
From maximum and basic point of view and for compatibility with the constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran and observing artistic rights of film makers in cinema, the previous permission system for entering into films shall be eliminated and supervision system shall be replaced i.e. supervision through judicial authorities depending on having private plaintiff or public prosecutor and this issue is compatible with principles 22 and 25 of the constitution of Islamic Republic of Iran and guarantees for prevention of violating artistic rights including: Right of freedom of artistic expression and right of selecting artistic job; since, when film maker is faced with different censorship system apart from damaging to his right of freedom of artistic expression, gradually the film director is not able to make money and have to change his job; thus, the process of issuing film screening license and basically entrance of government to intervention and censorship before screening the film, is on the contrary of legal system of Iran.
From minimal point of view, the available censorship system shall be amended at 2 levels:
First; A long, detailed and general list of censorship shall be shorten and clear and prevent from challenging the nature of films.
Second, It is necessary for holding administrative court in House of Cinema consisting of board of maximum film directors, film producers, actors, actresses, scenario writers and other involving jobs with an agent of Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance and a law scholar recommended by guild union of cinema and confirmation of Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance for complaining to Film censorship within maximum one month upon observing fair justice principles and it is possible to start lawsuit for judgments issued by this quasi-judicial authority to Administrative justice court.