Meritocracy is a fundamental principle of good governance and a key factor in organizational success, wherein individuals are appointed to managerial positions based on their scientific, practical, ethical, and value-based competencies. The theory of good governance has profoundly influenced administrative law, positing it as a requirement for achieving effective and appropriate management. Administrative bodies can deliver effective services only when they exhibit high productivity and efficiency. In modern governments, the selection or appointment of competent managers is a critical issue. Attention to the elements of good governance is crucial in this context, as it directly impacts the efficiency, effectiveness, and sustainability of organizations.
The results of this study indicate that the selection and appointment of managers based on individual and professional competencies can lead to improved efficiency, transparency, accountability, and a reduction in corruption within governance systems. This research also emphasizes the necessity of establishing legal and structural mechanisms to ensure meritocracy in the processes of selecting and appointing managers. The findings of this study can serve as a basis for future policymaking aimed at strengthening good governance.
In this paper, through a descriptive-analytical method and based on library studies, we aim to take a small step towards reforming the process of selecting and appointing managers in the country based on the meritocracy model by examining the components of good governance and presenting an appropriate model. Undoubtedly, designing an efficient and fair meritocracy system can increase citizen satisfaction, strengthen the relationship between citizens and the government, and improve the performance of governmental organizations.