The introduction of new technologies into the field of governance has fundamentally transformed the structure of administrative oversight. In administrative systems based on e-governance, digital tools play an important role in facilitating oversight of employee performance and improving the level of accountability of institutions. However, the abandonment of supervisory duties by government employees in such contexts is not simply a functional vacuum; it can also lead to disruption in the implementation of administrative justice and even the emergence of organized corruption and widespread public losses. In the meantime, a fundamental question arises: does the abandonment of supervisory duties within the framework of electronic systems require independent criminalization and should it be recognized as a behavior subject to criminal prosecution? The present article, with the aim of explaining the legal foundations of the criminalization of this type of abandonment of duties in the context of new technologies, examines the necessity or non-necessity of establishing new criminal laws in this field. The research method in this study is descriptive-analytical and is based on the analysis of legal documents, the examination of judicial practice, and a comparative study with the experiences of other countries in the field of digital governance. The research findings show that the changing nature of supervision in electronic platforms has created serious gaps in the current criminal structure; in such a way that in many cases, abandonment of supervisory duty is excluded from the effective scope of legal guarantees and, due to the lack of legal clarity and the