نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکترای حقوق عمومی دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تبریز، تبریز
2 استادیار دانشگاه تبریز
3 ناصر رهبر‌فرش‌پیرا، استادیار، گروه حقوق عمومی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Observance of laws and non-departure from the scope of legal authority is one of the most important conditions for the acquisition of lands and properties that occur within the scope of public plans, to the point of conflict between “securing the public interest” with “private property rights”, “community originality” with “individual rights” and the "rule of dominance" with the "rule of no harm". The purpose of the present study is to investigate the angles of illegal restriction of property rights of persons by approvals outside the authority of Article 5 commissions, which are reflected in the opinions of the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice. Therefore, in this study, using a descriptive-analytical method, the most important opinions of the General Assembly of the Administrative Justice Court on the subject of research have been analyzed. The results show that the approvals of Article 5 commissions that have restricted the property rights of individuals by ignoring the principles and laws, the rules of Sharia and the departure from the scope of authority, have been annulled by the General Assembly of the Court of Administrative Justice. In this respect, the Court should be considered a symbol of the protection of private property rights.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)