نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه حقوق، واحد قشم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قشم، ایران
2 گروه حقوق، واحد بندر عباس، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بندر عباس، ایران
3 گروه حقوق، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In the case proof system in administrative proceedings, the role of the administrative judge is undeniably important to guarantee the rights and freedoms of citizens.
In this article, an analytical and descriptive study, the subject of reason and the role of the administrative judge and the extent of his participation have been evaluated with regard to the specific goals and requirements of the administrative proceedings in the litigation proof system. The obligation of the judge to provide reasons in the decision is one of the important issues for establishing a fair trial.
This reasoning should be in a way that convinces the litigants and higher courts of the reasonableness of the decision.
Adhering to the independence and the degree of public interest, the administrative judge must conduct the necessary investigations to ensure the realization of the rule of law principle and the non-violation of the rights and freedoms of the citizens, and help the citizens who are deprived of access to many evidences and documents, and the inequality between the administration and compensate the citizen to some extent in administrative proceedings.
In all stages of the proceedings, from the preliminary investigation to the execution of the judgment. Previous researchers have paid less attention to the role of evidence in administrative proceedings and the role of the judge of the Administrative Court, the principle of procedural fairness, the principle of reasoned and documented judgements, the structure of administrative proceedings and the pathology of administrative proceedings.
کلیدواژهها [English]