Since the price of services is a very influential component in citizens' satisfaction with public services, regulating the price of public services is very important in terms of complying with the principles of public services and protecting the rights of consumers. Also, due to the effect of price on the state of competition between companies and public service actors, this issue is also important and sensitive in terms of competition law. The present research has dealt with the issue of regulating the price of public services in the light of the procedure of the Administrative Court of Justice with a descriptive-analytical method. The results of the analysis of the opinions of the Administrative Court of Justice in this matter show that the Administrative Court of Justice in the field of competition law rules such as text-centered and non-invoking the principle of "competition" and the prohibition of refusing to issue a business license under the pretext of "market saturation", and in Consumer rights have taken into consideration the prohibition of setting fines and punishments by the government and the prohibition of unfair discrimination in determining the price of services. Also, in the price regulation methods, criteria such as having the legal authority to determine the tariff, not changing the nature of the tariff by changing its title, identifying the determination of the price ceiling as a method of price regulation and emphasizing on updating the price ceiling rate based on economic changes have been specified.