The basis of good administration is the participation of citizens in decision-making. Based on this, the principle of hearing in administrative law is the concept of hearing the statements of the interested party before making a decision, and the opposite of that is placing a person in a pre-decided situation, in some laws of Iran, such as the decision of the provincial supervisory board around The eligibility of candidates to participate in parliamentary elections, the registration of property as national monuments and the trade union law of this principle have been taken into account in a few ways , Also, amending the court law, especially Article 16, is a useful step to realize the defense rights of individuals by knowing the reasons and documentation of the decision, but it is not in line with the right to be heard, but the duty of the institution to receive the request of the interested party and the obligation to provide an answer is a step towards being heard. , because before making a decision, a dialogue between the administration and the beneficiary is formed, and the citizen is effective in the administration's decision by providing explanations. Before the new amendment of the law, the court has issued a few opinions in this regard, which are analyzed and analyzed in this article.