نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران شمال؛ تهران ، ایران
2 دانشیار ، گروه حقوق، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران
3 دانشیار، گروه حقوق عمومی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Employing competent and capable forces in a fair and equal process is a necessary condition for the realization of the desired administration and optimal performance of public services, which is realized through the implementation and recognition of the principle of equality of opportunities and employment justice. These principles have been recognized in the third and twenty-eighth principles of the Constitution and Article (41) of the Civil Service Management Law. The contrast of employment quotas in public jobs with the principle of equal opportunities in entering the service is the subject of this article, and in this article it is discussed that according to the judicial approach of the General Board of the Administrative Justice Court, in what way employment quotas in entering public jobs contradict The concept of employment justice and the principle of equal opportunities? Although the expansion of quotas, especially towards the martyrs, as well as the selection of localities, is the dominant practice of the legislator in recent years; But the findings of the research indicate that according to the procedure of the General Board of the Court, it can be concluded that the establishment of any type of quota should be based on strong grounds and arguments that justify the difference in treatment in order to reduce inequalities and in line with the public interest. Every quota should be interpreted narrowly so as not to restrict the way to equal opportunities in employment.
کلیدواژهها [English]